What is a WISP, and Does Your Tax Practice Actually Need One?
A plain-English explainer for paid tax preparers: what a Written Information Security Plan is, who has to have one, and what happens if you don't.
A plain-English explainer for paid tax preparers: what a Written Information Security Plan is, who has to have one, and what happens if you don't.
If you renew a PTIN, the IRS now asks you a yes/no question: do you have a written security plan? Most paid preparers click yes without thinking about it. The IRS knows that, and the FTC has been telling them it’s a problem for several years now.
This post is for the solo CPA, the EA, the small tax shop in Lubbock or anywhere else, who suspects the answer might actually be no. Here’s what a Written Information Security Plan (WISP) is, who has to have one, and what’s at stake if you don’t.
A WISP is a document. It describes how your practice protects taxpayer information. That’s it. It’s not a piece of software you buy. It’s not a service you outsource. It’s a written record of:
The WISP exists so that on any given Tuesday morning, you can hand a copy to an auditor, an examiner, or a client, and say: this is how we run. Most practices that don’t have one couldn’t do that.
Two pieces of federal regulation make this required, not optional:
The FTC Safeguards Rule (16 CFR Part 314). This rule applies to “financial institutions” — and in 2003 the FTC explicitly defined paid tax preparers as financial institutions for the purposes of the rule. If you take money to prepare a tax return, you fall under it.
IRS Publication 4557 (“Safeguarding Taxpayer Data”). This is the IRS’s plain-language companion to the Safeguards Rule. It’s not law; it’s the IRS telling you exactly what they expect a compliant security program to look like. Pub 4557 explicitly says you need a written plan and lists what should be in it.
Both apply to solo practitioners. Both apply to firms with two staff. There is no small-firm exemption.
Three layers:
Direct penalties. The FTC can pursue civil penalties for Safeguards Rule violations. Numbers like $43,000 per violation get cited. In practice, the FTC mostly investigates after a breach, but the authority is real.
PTIN risk. Misrepresenting compliance on a PTIN renewal is a misrepresentation to the IRS. The IRS has been clear that this matters and that the question is not a formality.
The breach scenario. This is the one that actually shuts firms down. A staff member clicks a phishing email, the attacker pivots to your file server, and 800 client tax returns get exfiltrated. You have to notify every client, the IRS, possibly the state attorney general, and your E&O carrier. If you have a WISP and followed it, the conversation is “we were doing the right things and got hit anyway.” If you don’t, the conversation is “we were never doing what the regulations required.”
That second conversation tends to end careers.
The IRS gives a template in Pub 4557. The structure most firms end up with is:
A WISP is not a marketing document. It does not need to be polished. It needs to be true, and it needs to be followed.
There are three reasonable paths:
The wrong path is the fourth one: writing “yes” on the PTIN renewal and hoping no one ever asks to see the document.
If you want to know roughly where you stand right now, take our free WISP Compliance Check. It walks the same nine control areas the IRS covers in Pub 4557 and emails you a written gap report. No charge, no obligation, no marketing list.
If you want to talk to a human, our number is at the bottom of every page on this site.
Free IT Blueprint Assessment. We walk your office, look at every system, and leave you with a written punch list.
Book Walkthrough